Website checks to help you prepare for AdSense approval.

AdSense Readiness Checker

Analyze a domain for HTTPS, content depth, required pages, policy-risk keywords, metadata, and mobile friendliness.

Score 0-100
Weighted checks based on known public signals.
Private processing
Your website analysis runs securely in our protected system.
Safe crawling limits
5s timeout, 1MB response cap, and private-host blocking.
Analyze domain
Enter a domain like example.com. We will scan it and generate your readiness report.

What “AdSense readiness” actually means

AdSense approval is not based on one tag, one page, or one hidden technical trick. It depends on whether a site looks useful, trustworthy, and policy-aligned to human reviewers and automated quality systems. That includes unique content, clear navigation, complete policy pages, mobile usability, and a business model that does not feel misleading or low-effort.

This checker focuses on signals you can inspect publicly: HTTPS, content depth indicators, metadata quality, required legal pages, and policy-risk patterns. It does not claim to predict approval with certainty. Instead, it helps identify weaknesses that commonly reduce confidence during review.

The most valuable use of this tool is operational. It shortens the gap between “my site looks fine to me” and “here are the specific areas that still need work before I request another review.”

How to interpret low scores

Policy pages missing
Privacy, terms, contact, and support improve trust and transparency.
Missing trust pages often signal that the site is unfinished or not ready for advertiser traffic.
Content too shallow
Short hub pages and repetitive templates can look low value.
Expand route-level explanations, practical guidance, and original editorial context before reapplying.
UX confidence gaps
Navigation, mobile clarity, and broken states influence review quality.
A site can be technically valid but still feel weak if pages are hard to understand or thinly structured.

Best workflow before you request review

Start by checking core routes that a reviewer is most likely to visit: homepage, major category hubs, top content pages, and legal/trust pages. Fix missing policies and obvious crawl or metadata issues first because those problems are fast to address and easy to verify.

After the baseline is clean, focus on content quality. Add route-specific explanations, examples, FAQs, and internal links that help users understand the value of each section. This is where many rejections are won or lost because a site needs to feel genuinely useful, not merely functional.

Finally, review the balance between ads and content. Monetization should follow value, not lead it. If a page feels like a thin shell with aggressive placement, remove or reduce monetization until the content is strong enough to justify the page on its own.

Other tools you might want to try

Discover more fast utilities from this collection, plus one sponsored slot.

Browse all tools